Designing Healthier Homes by Eliminating Fossil Gas Appliance Emissions

By Positive Energy staff

---

The Architect's Role in Indoor Environmental Quality

Architects, as the primary designers of our built environment, hold a profoundly influential position in shaping the health and well-being of building occupants. Beyond the critical considerations of aesthetics, structural integrity, and energy performance, a deep understanding of the invisible forces at play within a building's envelope is increasingly paramount. This report aims to equip architects with the essential knowledge to proactively design for superior indoor air quality (IAQ), particularly concerning emissions from common household gas appliances. The decisions made during the design phase, from material selection to mechanical system integration, directly influence the indoor environment and, by extension, the health outcomes of those who inhabit these spaces. This effectively positions architects as critical guardians of public well-being within the built space, expanding their traditional role to encompass a vital public health responsibility.

Unmasking the Impact of Gas Appliances on Home Health

While gas appliances, such as stoves and heaters, are ubiquitous in modern homes due to their convenience and efficiency, their combustion byproducts and even unburned gas can significantly degrade indoor air quality. This degradation poses documented health risks that have been the subject of extensive scientific inquiry over the past two decades.1 These appliances release a complex cocktail of pollutants that, when confined within residential structures, can lead to a range of adverse health effects. The presence of these combustion products and hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) in indoor environments warrants a re-evaluation of their widespread use and the design strategies employed to mitigate their impact.2

Bridging Science and Design for Healthier Buildings

This post synthesizes complex scientific findings from leading institutions, including the Rocky Mountain Institute (RMI) 1, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 3, ASHRAE 2, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL).14 The goal is to translate these technical insights into actionable strategies for architectural practice. The report will detail specific pollutants emitted by gas appliances, their associated health effects, and, crucially, how thoughtful design and engineering solutions can effectively mitigate these risks, fostering truly healthier indoor environments.

---

Fundamentals of Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) for Architects

Defining Good IAQ: Source Control, Ventilation, and Filtration

Good indoor air quality management is fundamentally built upon three interconnected principles: controlling airborne pollutants at their source, ensuring adequate ventilation through the introduction of outdoor air and removal of indoor air, and employing effective filtration to remove contaminants from the air.9 Beyond these, maintaining acceptable temperature and relative humidity levels is also critical for overall IAQ and occupant comfort.10 These principles are not isolated but rather form a synergistic approach to managing indoor air. For example, while ventilation dilutes pollutants, it can also introduce outdoor contaminants, highlighting the need for a comprehensive strategy.22 It is particularly important to control pollutant sources, as IAQ problems can persist even with a properly operating HVAC system if the sources themselves are not addressed.10 This interconnectedness means architects must consider these elements holistically, recognizing that optimizing one pillar without considering the others can lead to suboptimal or even detrimental IAQ outcomes.

The Building as a Dynamic System: How Structure, Systems, and Occupants Shape IAQ

A building's indoor environment is not a static entity but a complex, dynamic system. Its IAQ is profoundly influenced by the intricate interactions among various factors, including the building's geographic site, local climate, physical structure, mechanical systems (HVAC), construction techniques, the array of internal and external contaminant sources, and the activities and behaviors of its occupants.10 Pollutants can originate from within the building itself, such as combustion byproducts from appliances or off-gassing from materials, or they can be drawn in from the outdoors, including vehicle emissions or pollen.10

Air exchange, a critical process for maintaining healthy IAQ, occurs through multiple pathways. These include designed mechanical ventilation systems utilizing fans, uncontrolled infiltration (the leakage of air through cracks and myriad openings in the building envelope), and the intentional opening of windows and doors.11 Air pressure differences, both within and around the building, act as driving forces that can move airborne pollutants through any available openings in walls, ceilings, floors, doors, windows, and even HVAC systems.10 This perspective underscores the importance of viewing the building envelope not as a passive barrier, but as an active, permeable interface that constantly mediates the exchange of air and pollutants between the interior and exterior. This dynamic interplay necessitates a design approach that manages these exchanges intentionally to promote health.

The "Building Tight, Ventilate Right" Imperative and Its IAQ Implications

Modern energy-efficient construction frequently adopts the strategy of "Building Tight, Ventilate Right".21 This approach is primarily driven by the goal of reducing energy consumption by minimizing uncontrolled air leakage, or infiltration, through the building envelope.20 By creating a tighter building, less energy is required for heating and cooling, which is a significant step towards sustainable design.

However, a crucial implication of this strategy is that reduced infiltration and ventilation rates in tightly sealed buildings can lead to a significant increase in the concentration of indoor-generated contaminants.10 The very measures taken to enhance energy efficiency, such as improved insulation and sealing, can inadvertently trap pollutants indoors if not accompanied by compensatory measures. This creates a fundamental tension for architects: while energy efficiency is a vital design objective, it must be meticulously balanced with robust, intentional mechanical ventilation strategies. Without such integrated planning, the unintended consequence can be elevated pollutant levels and compromised indoor air quality, undermining the overall health performance of the building.10 This highlights the necessity of designing for controlled air exchange rather than relying on uncontrolled leakage.

Why Indoor Air Pollutants Often Exceed Outdoor Levels

It is a common, yet often mistaken, assumption that indoor air is inherently cleaner than outdoor air. However, studies conducted by the EPA and other research institutions consistently demonstrate that indoor levels of many air pollutants can be 2 to 5 times, and occasionally more than 100 times, higher than outdoor levels.6 This phenomenon is particularly concerning given that people spend approximately 90% of their time indoors.9

The primary reason for this disparity is the presence of numerous pollutant sources located within the building itself.11 These internal sources include combustion from appliances, off-gassing from building materials and furnishings, and emissions from cleaning products, among many others.6 When these internally generated pollutants are released into a relatively confined space and then trapped by a tighter building envelope—a characteristic of modern, energy-efficient construction—their concentrations can rapidly accumulate and surpass outdoor levels.6 This situation, sometimes referred to as the "concentration trap," means that the primary challenge for architects is not merely preventing outdoor pollutants from entering, but effectively managing and removing the contaminants generated within the home. This understanding underscores the critical need for proactive IAQ design that addresses internal pollutant generation.

---

Key Pollutants from Gas Appliances and Their Health Implications

Gas appliances, particularly those used for cooking and heating, are significant indoor sources of a variety of pollutants. The combustion process, and even the unburned fuel itself, can release substances that pose substantial risks to human health. Understanding these specific pollutants and their impacts is crucial for architects aiming to design healthier homes.

Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2): A Respiratory Concern

Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and nitric oxide (NO) are toxic gases, with NO2 being particularly hazardous as a highly reactive oxidant and corrosive agent.3 The primary indoor sources of NO2 are combustion processes, especially from unvented gas stoves, kerosene heaters, and defective vented appliances.2 While electric coil burners also emit NO2, their emission rates are significantly lower than those from gas burners, making gas combustion the predominant concern for this pollutant in residential settings.18

The health effects of NO2 exposure range from immediate irritation to more severe, long-term respiratory conditions. NO2 acts mainly as an irritant, affecting the mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, throat, and respiratory tract.3 Even low-level exposure can significantly impact sensitive individuals, leading to increased bronchial reactivity in asthmatics, decreased lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a heightened risk of respiratory infections, particularly in young children.3 Extremely high-dose exposure, such as might occur in a building fire, can result in severe outcomes like pulmonary edema and diffuse lung injury.3 Continued exposure to elevated NO2 levels can also contribute to the development of acute or chronic bronchitis.3 ASHRAE identifies NO2 as a potential cause of respiratory disease, underscoring its importance in IAQ considerations.2

Indoor NO2 levels in homes with gas stoves frequently surpass outdoor concentrations.3 Studies by LBNL have consistently shown that NO2 levels in indoor environments where gas appliances are used often approach or exceed ambient air quality standards.14 For example, in an experimental kitchen, NO2 concentrations reached as high as 2500 µg/m3 when there was no stove vent and low air exchange.14 Further research in energy-efficient homes revealed that NO2 levels in both kitchens and living rooms frequently exceeded the EPA's proposed one-hour ambient air quality standard of 470 µg/m3 (equivalent to 100 ppb) following typical gas stove use.14 A study of nine Northern California homes found that four of them had kitchen 1-hour NO2 concentrations exceeding the national ambient air quality standard (100 ppb), with elevated levels also observed throughout the home, including bedrooms.17 This demonstrates that homes with gas stoves are actively creating an indoor environment that disproportionately impacts sensitive individuals, particularly children, placing them at higher risk for respiratory illness and infection.

Carbon Monoxide (CO): The Silent, Deadly Gas

Carbon monoxide (CO) is a particularly insidious pollutant because it is an odorless, colorless, and toxic gas, making it impossible to detect without specialized alarms.4 It is a primary product of the incomplete combustion of natural gas.2 Key indoor sources from gas appliances include unvented gas space heaters, gas stoves, and back-drafting from other combustion appliances such as furnaces, gas water heaters, wood stoves, and fireplaces.3 The risk of CO emissions significantly increases with poorly adjusted or inadequately maintained combustion devices.4

The health effects of CO exposure vary widely based on the concentration, duration of exposure, and the individual's age and overall health.4 Acute effects are primarily due to the formation of carboxyhemoglobin in the blood, which severely inhibits the body's ability to absorb and transport oxygen.4 At low concentrations, CO can cause fatigue in healthy individuals and chest pain in those with pre-existing heart disease. Moderate concentrations may lead to symptoms such as angina, impaired vision, and reduced brain function. At higher concentrations, individuals may experience impaired vision and coordination, headaches, dizziness, confusion, nausea, and flu-like symptoms that typically resolve upon leaving the affected area. At very high concentrations, CO exposure is fatal.4 Given these severe risks, ASHRAE strongly recommends the installation of carbon monoxide alarms in all homes, regardless of the heating fuel type used.2

Typical CO levels in homes without combustion appliances generally range from 0.5 to 5 parts per million (ppm). In homes with properly adjusted gas stoves, levels are often between 5 and 15 ppm, but near poorly adjusted stoves, these levels can escalate to 30 ppm or higher.4 While an LBNL study in an energy-efficient house did not find CO levels exceeding the EPA one-hour standard (40 mg/m3) 14, it is important to acknowledge that the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) reports approximately 170 deaths annually from CO produced by non-automotive consumer products, including malfunctioning fuel-burning appliances.2 A critical architectural and engineering concern arises from the interaction of ventilation systems with the building envelope. High airflow range hoods, intended to improve IAQ, can inadvertently create negative pressure within a home, potentially causing other combustion appliances (like furnaces or water heaters) to backdraft, drawing harmful carbon monoxide into living areas.8 This highlights the complex, interconnected nature of building physics, where ventilation design must be carefully integrated with the overall airtightness of the building and the presence of other combustion appliances.

Particulate Matter (PM2.5 & Ultrafine Particles): Microscopic Threats

Particulate matter (PM) found indoors originates from both outdoor air and a variety of indoor activities.8 Key indoor sources include cooking, certain cleaning activities, and combustion processes such as burning candles, using fireplaces, unvented space heaters, kerosene heaters, and tobacco products.8 Gas appliances, particularly unvented ones, are significant sources of ultrafine particles (less than 100 nm in diameter) and respirable particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5).2 Cooking activities, especially frying, broiling, and grilling, are major contributors to indoor PM2.5 emissions, with the rapid production of large quantities of PM when food is burned.8

The health effects of exposure to airborne particles, particularly fine particles (PM2.5) and ultrafine particles, have been recognized for millennia.13 PM2.5 is especially concerning because its minute size allows it to penetrate deeply into the respiratory system, leading to increased short- and long-term adverse health effects.13 Ultrafine particles have been specifically linked to oxidative damage to DNA and increased mortality.2 The aggregate harm to the population in the indoor environment, measured in Disability Adjusted Life Years (DALY), is overwhelmingly dominated by exposure to particulate matter, surpassing other contaminants by a factor of five.13 This makes PM the single most significant indoor air quality health burden. Furthermore, airborne pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, are transmitted via respiratory aerosols that are predominantly fine particles.13

Despite the migration of outdoor pollution indoors, particles generated from indoor sources often constitute the majority of an individual's personal exposure.13 LBNL studies confirmed this, showing that natural gas cooking burner use led to very high 1-hour kitchen particle number (PN) concentrations (exceeding 2x10^5 cm-3-h) in all homes studied.17 While ventilation is important for overall IAQ, LBNL research explicitly states that PM2.5-related health burdens are not very sensitive to changes in ventilation rates, and that filtration is significantly more effective at controlling PM2.5 concentrations and their associated health effects.15 This finding is crucial for architects, as it highlights that while ventilation plays a role, filtration is the superior and necessary strategy for mitigating the predominant indoor health risk posed by particulate matter.

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): Formaldehyde, Benzene, and Beyond

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) are emitted as gases from a vast array of indoor products and materials, with their concentrations consistently found to be higher indoors—often 2 to 10 times higher—than outdoors.6 Gas appliances are identified as sources of formaldehyde.14 Beyond combustion, unburned natural gas itself contains hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), notably benzene, which is detected in a high percentage (99%) of residential natural gas samples.23 Benzene is also a known byproduct of combustion processes 2, and other common indoor sources include environmental tobacco smoke and automobile exhaust from attached garages.6

Exposure to VOCs can induce a range of immediate symptoms, including irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat, headaches, dizziness, loss of coordination, and nausea.5 More severe or long-term exposure can lead to damage to the liver, kidneys, and central nervous system.5 Critically, some organic chemicals are known to cause cancer in animals, and several are suspected or confirmed human carcinogens.5 Formaldehyde is particularly well-documented as a cause of sensory irritation and is identified as the primary risk driver for cancer health effects in studies of offices and schools.15 Benzene is unequivocally classified by the EPA as a Group A, known human carcinogen for all routes of exposure, with occupational exposure linked to an increased incidence of leukemia.7

A significant and often overlooked finding is that benzene is detected in 99% of unburned natural gas samples from residential stoves.23 Furthermore, leakage from gas stoves and ovens while they are not in use (i.e., when they are off) can result in indoor benzene concentrations that exceed health reference levels established by the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA). These concentrations can be comparable to those found in environmental tobacco smoke.23 Such exceedances are particularly likely when there are elevated leakage rates combined with low ventilation rates.23 This finding is particularly important because it means the carcinogenic risk from benzene is not limited to cooking times but is continuous, even when appliances are idle. This significantly strengthens the argument for addressing the source of the fuel itself, as ventilation alone is not highly effective in reducing airborne concentrations of semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), which are higher molecular weight VOCs that tend to reside mostly on indoor surfaces.16 This has broad implications for architectural specifications and policy regarding gas appliances.

The Unseen Byproduct with Health and Durability Consequences

Water vapor is a primary product of natural gas combustion.2 Unvented combustion appliances can produce a substantial amount of moisture, contributing significantly to the overall internal moisture load of a home.2 Other internal moisture sources include human respiration and perspiration, cooking, bathing, washing, plants, and pets.24

The presence of dampness in buildings, even in the absence of visible mold growth, has been consistently linked to adverse health outcomes, particularly respiratory problems.2 Mold growth, a common biological contaminant, thrives in high humidity environments, specifically when relative humidity is consistently above 50%.10 Mold is a known trigger for asthma symptoms and allergic reactions.10 A critical interplay exists between energy-efficient design and moisture management. Modern, tightly sealed building envelopes, while beneficial for energy efficiency by reducing sensible cooling loads, can inadvertently reduce the incidental dehumidification provided by cooling systems.24 This means that the moisture generated indoors by gas appliances and other activities is more likely to be trapped, leading to elevated indoor humidity levels if not properly managed. Elevated humidity, in turn, is a primary catalyst for mold growth, creating a feedback loop where energy-efficient design, if not coupled with deliberate moisture control and ventilation strategies, can inadvertently create conditions conducive to mold and associated health problems. This highlights the necessity of integrated design thinking that accounts for moisture balance.

---

Architectural Strategies for Mitigating Gas Appliance Health Risks

Prioritizing Source Control in Design

Effective indoor air quality management begins with source control—the elimination or reduction of pollutant emissions at their origin. This is often the most impactful strategy for safeguarding occupant health.

Appliance Selection: Embracing All-Electric and Electronic Ignitions

Source control is identified as the primary and most effective method for limiting indoor exposure to volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs).16 ASHRAE explicitly advises consumers who wish to reduce the risk of adverse health effects from combustion products to avoid using unvented appliances.2 When specifying gas cooking appliances, selecting models with electronic ignitions is recommended where possible.2 A profound understanding of the risks associated with gas appliances extends beyond their operational use. The discovery that unburned natural gas leaks from stoves, even when they are off, can continuously release carcinogenic benzene 23, provides a compelling health-based rationale for architects to advocate for and design all-electric homes. This moves beyond solely energy efficiency arguments to directly address a pervasive, continuous, and carcinogenic exposure that cannot be fully mitigated by ventilation alone, offering a significant health benefit to occupants.

Proper Appliance Installation and Maintenance Considerations

For any permanently mounted unvented combustion appliances, strict adherence to manufacturer installation instructions and local codes is paramount, with installation performed by a qualified professional.2 Regular, annual inspections by a qualified service technician are also strongly recommended to ensure proper function and minimize emissions.2 For example, poorly adjusted gas stoves can lead to significantly elevated carbon monoxide levels, potentially reaching 30 ppm or higher.4 The proper installation and ongoing maintenance are critical to preventing dangerous pollutant accumulation in the home.

Designing for Effective Ventilation

Ventilation is a cornerstone of good indoor air quality, essential for diluting and removing pollutants that cannot be entirely eliminated through source control.

The Critical Role of Ducted Range Hoods: Capture Efficiency and Airflow Requirements

Venting nitrogen dioxide (NO2) sources to the outdoors and installing a ducted exhaust fan over gas stoves are among the most effective measures to reduce exposure to combustion pollutants.3 Studies by LBNL demonstrate that operating a venting range hood can substantially reduce cooking burner pollutant concentrations, achieving reductions in the range of 80-95% for well-designed hoods.17 LBNL simulations specifically recommend a minimum capture efficiency of at least 70% for range hoods to avoid unacceptably high 1-hour average NO2 concentrations (100 ppb or higher) and at least 60% capture efficiency to avoid unacceptably high 24-hour average PM2.5 concentrations (25 µg/m3 or higher).18 These targets are particularly crucial for multi-family homes, which have smaller air volumes for pollutant dilution, leading to higher concentrations if not properly managed.18 Range hoods should be operated during cooking and for an additional 10-20 minutes afterward to ensure effective pollutant removal.8 In contrast, recirculating (non-venting) range hoods are largely ineffective for NO2 and CO2, offering only small net reductions, though they may achieve modest PM reductions (~30%).17 This highlights that architects must look beyond raw airflow numbers (CFM) and prioritize the design, geometry, and placement of the hood relative to the cooking surface and the overall kitchen layout to ensure effective pollutant capture, rather than just air movement.

Beyond the Kitchen: Whole-House Ventilation Strategies for Tighter Envelopes

While kitchen-specific ventilation is crucial, whole-house ventilation strategies are also necessary, especially in tighter building envelopes. Increased outdoor air ventilation can effectively reduce indoor concentrations of many VOCs.16 However, it is important to note that ventilation typically increases building energy use 22 and is not highly effective for reducing semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), which tend to adsorb onto indoor surfaces rather than remain airborne.16 ASHRAE recommends that when air-sealing measures are implemented in a building containing unvented appliances, ventilation should be reassessed and augmented if necessary to maintain adequate indoor air quality.2

Addressing Backdrafting Risks in High-Performance Homes

A critical design consideration for architects is the risk of backdrafting. High airflow range hoods, while effective at removing cooking pollutants, can create negative pressure within a tightly sealed home. This negative pressure can potentially draw harmful carbon monoxide from other combustion appliances (e.g., furnaces, water heaters, fireplaces) into the living space through their flues or chimneys.8 This complex interaction between powerful exhaust systems and the building envelope's airtightness necessitates careful planning. Architects must consult with qualified MEP engineers and other professionals during the design and installation phases to properly size and integrate ventilation systems, ensuring that backdrafting is prevented, potentially through the incorporation of make-up air systems.8

Table 2: Recommended Ventilation Strategies for Gas Appliance Pollutant Control

This table provides concrete, quantitative design targets for architects, translating scientific recommendations into actionable performance metrics. It offers specific guidance that can be incorporated into design specifications and discussions with mechanical engineers, helping to bridge the technical depth gap for architects.

Integrating Filtration for Enhanced IAQ

While ventilation plays a crucial role in diluting pollutants, filtration serves as a distinct and highly effective strategy for actively removing contaminants from the air.

The Role of High-Efficiency Filtration for Particulate Matter

LBNL research explicitly states that filtration is significantly more effective than ventilation at controlling PM2.5 concentrations and their associated health effects.15 This is a critical distinction, as it means architects cannot rely solely on increased ventilation to address all indoor air pollution problems, particularly for particulate matter, which constitutes the most significant indoor health burden. ASHRAE recommends MERV-13 or better filtration for reducing infectious aerosol exposure, a standard increasingly adopted as a new baseline in building codes and guidelines.13 Cost-benefit analyses consistently demonstrate that air cleaning for PM2.5 control is highly cost-effective, offering substantial health benefits.13 ASHRAE is actively working to incorporate requirements for controlling indoor particle concentrations into its standards for all building types and climatic conditions, further emphasizing the importance of this strategy.13 This highlights the necessity of integrating robust filtration systems as a complementary, rather than substitutable, strategy for comprehensive IAQ.

Limitations of Ventilation Alone for Certain Pollutants

It is critical for architects to understand that ventilation alone has inherent limitations in addressing the full spectrum of indoor air pollutants. While increased ventilation helps dilute many volatile organic compounds (VOCs), it is significantly less effective for semivolatile organic compounds (SVOCs), which primarily reside on indoor surfaces rather than remaining airborne.16 Moreover, as previously highlighted, PM2.5-related health burdens are not highly sensitive to changes in ventilation rates.15 This means architects must recognize that simply increasing airflow will not solve all indoor air pollution problems, particularly for persistent particulates and certain surface-bound VOCs. This understanding mandates the inclusion of high-efficiency filtration as a distinct, necessary layer of protection, especially in tightly built homes where internally generated particulates and surface-bound VOCs can accumulate.

Monitoring and Alarms: Essential Safeguards

Beyond proactive design, equipping homes with appropriate monitoring and alarm systems provides essential safeguards and empowers occupants to manage their indoor environment.

Mandatory Carbon Monoxide Alarms

The installation of carbon monoxide (CO) alarms is a non-negotiable safety measure, strongly recommended by ASHRAE for all homes, irrespective of the heating fuel type used.2 These alarms provide critical early warning for a colorless, odorless, and potentially fatal gas, serving as a last line of defense against acute CO poisoning.

Considering Advanced IAQ Monitors for Comprehensive Protection

Beyond mandatory safety alarms, architects should consider integrating advanced indoor air quality monitors into their designs. While consumer IAQ monitors may not always detect ultrafine particles, they have proven useful in alerting occupants to significant PM2.5 sources, such as cooking events.19 These monitors can provide real-time data, empowering occupants to make informed decisions about ventilation and source control, and offering a proactive approach to maintaining healthy indoor environments. This approach moves beyond mere code compliance to a continuous, performance-based assessment of IAQ, enhancing the building's value and occupant well-being.

Collaboration with MEP Engineers and Qualified Professionals

The successful implementation of healthy building strategies, particularly concerning gas appliance emissions, necessitates close and early collaboration between architects, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) engineers, and other qualified building professionals. Professional installation and annual maintenance by certified technicians are crucial for the safe and efficient operation of gas appliances.2 Furthermore, the selection and installation of high-airflow range hoods, essential for pollutant removal, requires expert consultation to prevent the dangerous phenomenon of backdrafting, which can draw carbon monoxide into living spaces.8 ASHRAE advocates for installer certification to ensure competence in these critical areas.2 The complex interactions between the building envelope, mechanical systems, and pollutant pathways underscore that architects cannot address indoor air quality in isolation. While architects lead the overall design, their ability to foster and integrate expert collaboration is paramount to achieving truly healthy indoor environments.

---

Building a Healthier Future

This report has illuminated the significant, often unseen, health impacts of fossil fuel combustion gas appliances in homes. The analysis has detailed how these appliances contribute to a complex array of indoor air pollutants, including nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and particulate matter (PM2.5), which exacerbate respiratory illnesses like asthma. Furthermore, the report highlighted the carcinogenic risks posed by volatile organic compounds such as benzene, notably from the continuous leakage of unburned natural gas, even when appliances are off. The critical role of moisture management was also underscored, revealing how the moisture byproduct of combustion, combined with tighter building envelopes, can create conditions conducive to mold growth and associated health problems.

Architects are uniquely positioned to mitigate these risks through informed design choices that prioritize occupant health. This includes advocating for and specifying source control measures, such as the transition to all-electric homes, thereby eliminating the continuous release of hazardous air pollutants. It also involves implementing robust ducted ventilation systems with high capture efficiency for kitchen exhaust, integrating advanced filtration for particulate matter throughout the home, and specifying essential monitoring and alarm systems to provide continuous oversight of indoor air quality.

By understanding the intricate dynamics of indoor air quality and the specific hazards associated with gas appliances, architects can move beyond conventional design to become leaders in creating truly healthy, high-performance homes. This leadership demands a commitment to continuous learning, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration with MEP engineers and building science specialists, and adopting a proactive approach to safeguarding occupant well-being. The future of residential design necessitates buildings that are not only energy-efficient and aesthetically pleasing but are fundamentally engineered and designed for optimal human health.

---

Works cited

1. Gas Stoves: Health and Air Quality Impacts and Solutions - RMI, accessed May 22, 2025, https://rmi.org/insight/gas-stoves-pollution-health

2. UNVENTED COMBUSTION DEVICES AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY - ASHRAE, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/about/position%20documents/unvented-combustion-devices-and-iaq-pd-6.28.2023.pdf

3. Nitrogen Dioxide's Impact on Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/nitrogen-dioxides-impact-indoor-air-quality

4. Carbon Monoxide's Impact on Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/carbon-monoxides-impact-indoor-air-quality

5. Volatile Organic Compounds' Impact on Indoor Air Quality - Regulations.gov, accessed May 22, 2025, https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OLEM-2021-0397-0364/attachment_7.pdf

6. Volatile Organic Compounds' Impact on Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/volatile-organic-compounds-impact-indoor-air-quality

7. www.epa.gov, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-09/documents/benzene.pdf

8. Sources of Indoor Particulate Matter (PM) | US EPA, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/sources-indoor-particulate-matter-pm

9. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) | US EPA - Environmental Protection Agency, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq

10. Reference Guide for Indoor Air Quality in Schools | US EPA, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/iaq-schools/reference-guide-indoor-air-quality-schools

11. Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/report-environment/indoor-air-quality

12. Indoor Air Pollution: An Introduction for Health Professionals | US EPA, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/indoor-air-pollution-introduction-health-professionals

13. www.ashrae.org, accessed May 22, 2025, https://www.ashrae.org/file%20library/communities/committees/standing%20committees/environmental%20health%20committee%20(ehc)/emerging-issue-brief-pm.pdf

14. escholarship.org, accessed May 22, 2025, https://escholarship.org/uc/item/20m838s6.pdf

15. Effect Of Ventilation On Chronic Health Risks In Schools And Offices ..., accessed May 22, 2025, https://indoor.lbl.gov/publications/effect-ventilation-chronic-health

16. Volatile Organic Compounds | Indoor Air, accessed May 22, 2025, https://iaqscience.lbl.gov/volatile-organic-compounds-topics

17. escholarship.org, accessed May 22, 2025, https://escholarship.org/content/qt9bc0w046/qt9bc0w046.pdf

18. eta-publications.lbl.gov, accessed May 22, 2025, https://eta-publications.lbl.gov/sites/default/files/lbnl_report_simulations_of_short-term_exposure_to_no2_and_pm2.5_to_inform_capture_efficiency_standards.pdf

19. Air Quality Sensors - Indoor Environment - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, accessed May 22, 2025, https://indoor.lbl.gov/air-quality-sensors

20. iJlllilJfl - INIS, accessed May 22, 2025, https://inis.iaea.org/records/bjg5s-99429/files/15052561.pdf?download=1

21. Envelope Leakage - LBNL Residential, accessed May 22, 2025, https://resdb.lbl.gov/index.html?step=2&sub=2&run_env_model

22. Ventilation & Air Cleaning - Indoor Environment - Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, accessed May 22, 2025, https://indoor.lbl.gov/ventilation-and-air-cleaning

23. Composition, Emissions, and Air Quality Impacts of Hazardous Air ..., accessed May 22, 2025, https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.est.2c02581

24. Humidity Implications for Meeting Residential Ventilation Requirements, accessed May 22, 2025, https://web.ornl.gov/sci/buildings/conf-archive/2007%20B10%20papers/197_Walker.pdf

Breathing Easy: The Case for a National Indoor Air Quality Code in the United States

By Positive Energy staff

---

A Call To Code

The United States faces a significant, yet largely unregulated, public health challenge: the quality of the air inside its buildings. Americans spend approximately 90% of their time indoors (1), breathing air that can be two to five times, and occasionally more than 100 times, more polluted than outdoor air.(3) Despite this reality, the nation lacks a comprehensive federal code specifically governing indoor air quality (IAQ), relying instead on a fragmented system of state regulations, voluntary guidelines, and limited occupational standards.(5) This regulatory gap results in inconsistent protection and contributes to a silent epidemic of health problems—ranging from asthma and allergies to cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and cancer—and imposes a substantial economic burden through healthcare costs and lost productivity, estimated in the tens to hundreds of billions of dollars annually.(7)

This report makes the case that the United States would significantly benefit from establishing a national IAQ code, drawing parallels with the proven success of existing building codes for structural integrity, fire safety, electrical systems, and plumbing. These established codes, often born from past tragedies, have demonstrably saved lives, prevented injuries, and enhanced public welfare by setting minimum safety standards.(10) An IAQ code would function similarly, addressing the invisible threat of indoor air pollution by establishing baseline requirements for ventilation, filtration, and source control, mitigating risks that occupants cannot easily assess or control themselves.

A national IAQ code could be founded on principles derived from EPA recommendations, ASHRAE standards (particularly 62.1 and 62.2), WHO guidelines, and international best practices.(13) Key components would include minimum health-based ventilation rates, enhanced air filtration requirements (e.g., MERV 13+), limits on indoor pollutant sources (e.g., VOCs, formaldehyde), and protocols for monitoring and maintenance.(16) While challenges related to implementation costs, technical complexities, and stakeholder coordination exist (19), cost-benefit analyses consistently show that the long-term economic and health benefits of improved IAQ far outweigh the investments required.(21)

Recommendations include legislative action to establish a federal IAQ mandate, phased implementation with financial and technical support, increased investment in research and workforce development, and fostering public-private partnerships. Implementing a national IAQ code is not merely a regulatory measure; it is a critical investment in public health, economic productivity, educational attainment, and national resilience against environmental threats and future pandemics. Just as past generations codified protections against fire and structural collapse, the time has come to ensure the air we breathe indoors supports, rather than harms, our health and well-being.

---

The Invisible Threat: Understanding the Indoor Air Quality Crisis in the United States

While considerable attention and regulatory effort have focused on outdoor air pollution, the quality of air within the buildings where Americans live, work, learn, and play remains a largely unaddressed environmental health concern. The very structures designed to shelter us can trap and concentrate pollutants, leading to exposures that significantly impact health, quality of life, and impose substantial economic costs. Understanding the scope of this crisis, including the current regulatory landscape and the profound consequences of inaction, is the first step toward establishing necessary protections.

The Current Regulatory Void: A Patchwork of Inconsistent Standards

Unlike outdoor air, which is subject to federal regulation under the Clean Air Act through the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (5), indoor air quality in the United States lacks a comprehensive, binding national framework. The federal government's authority over IAQ is primarily limited to federal buildings.(5) No single federal law or agency is tasked with governing IAQ across the nation's diverse building stock.(6)

This absence of federal leadership means the responsibility for improving IAQ largely defaults to individual states. The result is a fragmented and inconsistent "patchwork of regulations and varied approaches across the country".(5) Some states have taken proactive steps, adopting portions of the Johns Hopkins Model Clean Indoor Air Quality Act (MCIAA) (5), establishing task forces, or setting specific standards for schools or public buildings.(5) California, for example, has incorporated detailed ventilation and filtration requirements, including MERV 13 filters, into its Title 24 energy code for residential buildings.(25) However, many other states have minimal or no specific IAQ regulations, relying on general building code provisions that may not adequately address modern IAQ concerns.(9) This geographic disparity creates inherent inequities, where the level of protection from indoor air hazards depends significantly on state or local jurisdiction rather than on a uniform national standard of care. Citizens in states with weaker regulations receive less protection, potentially leading to worse health outcomes, particularly for vulnerable populations residing in those areas.

Federal agencies do play limited roles. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts research, issues voluntary guidelines, and promotes best practices, such as the Clean Air in Buildings Challenge.(5) However, these guidelines are generally not enforceable in non-federal buildings.(5) The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is responsible for workplace safety, but it does not have specific IAQ standards.(27) OSHA relies on existing standards for ventilation and specific contaminants, along with the General Duty Clause, which requires employers to provide a workplace free from known hazards likely to cause death or serious injury.(27) This clause can be applied to severe IAQ problems, but it does not provide a proactive, comprehensive framework for managing everyday indoor air quality in workplaces.

The existence of voluntary frameworks like the MCIAA 5 and ASHRAE Standards 62.1 and 62.2 13 highlights the recognized need for standardized approaches to IAQ. Yet, decades of reliance on these voluntary measures and fragmented state action have proven insufficient to ensure a baseline level of safe indoor air nationwide.(19) This regulatory "gap" 5 is not a neutral void; it represents a significant ongoing opportunity cost, contributing directly to preventable illnesses, cognitive impairment, lost productivity, and premature deaths across the country. A mandatory, national approach is needed to address this systemic failure.

The Heavy Toll of Neglected Indoor Air

The failure to adequately regulate and manage indoor air quality imposes severe and widespread burdens on public health and the national economy. These costs, though often hidden or underestimated, are substantial and affect millions of Americans daily.

Public Health Impacts: A Silent Epidemic

Poor indoor air quality is linked to a wide range of adverse health effects, contributing to what can be considered a silent epidemic. Exposure to indoor pollutants can cause immediate effects such as irritation of the eyes, nose, and throat, headaches, dizziness, and fatigue.(2) More concerning are the long-term health consequences, which can manifest after years of exposure or prolonged periods of exposure.(2)

Common indoor pollutants contribute significantly to respiratory illnesses. Particulate matter (PM), especially fine particles (PM2.5), can penetrate deep into the lungs and even enter the bloodstream, exacerbating conditions like asthma and COPD, and increasing the risk of lung cancer, heart attacks, and other cardiovascular problems.(28) Household air pollution, often from cooking with polluting fuels but also relevant to poorly ventilated homes with other sources, is a major global killer, responsible for millions of premature deaths annually from ischemic heart disease, stroke, lower respiratory infections (LRI), COPD, and lung cancer.(30) Exposure nearly doubles the risk for childhood LRI and is responsible for 44% of pneumonia deaths in children under five.(31) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), emitted from building materials, furniture, cleaning products, and paints, can cause irritation, headaches, and long-term damage to the liver, kidneys, and central nervous system.(2) Mold growth due to excess moisture is linked to asthma development and exacerbation, allergies, and respiratory infections.(2) Other pollutants like carbon monoxide (CO) from combustion appliances (2), radon seeping from the ground (2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from gas stoves and heaters (28), and ozone (O3) (28) also pose significant health risks. The American Medical Association specifically recognizes the link between gas stove use, indoor NO2 levels, and increased risk and severity of childhood asthma.(33)

Beyond respiratory and cardiovascular impacts, compelling evidence now links poor air quality, including indoor exposures, to cognitive impairment. Studies have shown associations between long-term exposure to PM2.5 and poorer performance in memory, attention, and executive function in older adults, potentially accelerating cognitive aging and increasing dementia risk.(35) Poor IAQ in offices has been shown to reduce cognitive function scores significantly (37), and research suggests improved ventilation in classrooms can positively impact student cognitive performance.(3) This cognitive toll represents a significant, often under-appreciated, impact on education, workplace productivity, and overall quality of life.

Certain populations are disproportionately affected. Children are particularly vulnerable due to their developing organ systems, higher breathing rates relative to body weight, and significant time spent in environments like schools, where IAQ may be poor.(1) Asthma, the leading chronic disease causing school absenteeism (1), is strongly linked to indoor allergens and pollutants. The elderly and individuals with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular conditions also face heightened risks.(2) Furthermore, low-income and minority communities often experience higher exposures due to factors like substandard housing, proximity to outdoor pollution sources, and limited resources to mitigate IAQ problems.(2)

The sheer number of people affected underscores the scale of the problem. Over 50 million Americans suffer from allergic diseases, many related to indoor allergens like dust mites, pet dander, and cockroaches.(1) Asthma affects 20-30 million Americans.(1) The pervasiveness of indoor sources—building materials, furnishings, cleaning products, combustion appliances, and human occupancy itself 2—means that exposure is nearly constant, making source control and effective ventilation and filtration critical public health interventions.

Table 1: Health Effects of Common Indoor Air Pollutants

The Economic Burden: A Drain on National Resources

The public health crisis engendered by poor IAQ translates directly into a significant economic burden for the United States. This burden manifests in multiple ways, including direct healthcare expenditures, lost productivity due to illness and cognitive impairment, and reduced educational attainment.

Direct healthcare costs associated with treating IAQ-related illnesses are substantial. Studies have estimated billions of dollars spent annually on conditions exacerbated or caused by poor indoor environments, such as asthma, allergies, and respiratory infections.(7) For instance, one analysis estimated $36 billion in annual healthcare costs (in 1996 dollars) attributable to common respiratory illnesses linked to indoor environments.(7) More recent figures show staggering increases in spending on respiratory conditions, reaching over $170 billion in 2016 (42), and asthma treatments alone costing Americans an average of $88 billion annually.(42) While not solely due to IAQ, indoor exposures are a major contributing factor. The broader cost of air pollution, much of which occurs indoors or infiltrates from outside, runs into the hundreds of billions annually when considering premature deaths and illnesses.(43)

Beyond direct medical expenses, the indirect costs associated with lost productivity are enormous. Poor IAQ contributes to increased absenteeism from work and school.(3) Estimates suggest millions of lost workdays annually due to IAQ-related symptoms and illnesses.(7) Furthermore, even when present, workers and students may experience reduced performance and difficulty concentrating due to symptoms like headaches, fatigue, or pollutant-induced cognitive impairment.(27) This phenomenon, sometimes termed "presenteeism," significantly hampers productivity. Studies estimate that poor IAQ can decrease overall worker productivity by as much as 10% (37), and the costs associated with lost productivity from "sick building syndrome" symptoms alone have been estimated at $93 billion per year.(8) More recent estimates place the potential annual economic value of IAQ improvements in the workplace at over $130 billion nationwide, with $50 billion potentially saved just from avoided sick days.(9)

In educational settings, poor IAQ not only increases student and staff absenteeism but also negatively impacts learning and academic performance.(3) This has long-term economic consequences for both individuals and society, potentially leading to lower lifetime earnings and reduced national competitiveness. Additionally, poor IAQ can shorten the lifespan and effectiveness of building systems and equipment, leading to increased maintenance and replacement costs for building owners, including school districts.(3)

Crucially, the economic narrative often focuses disproportionately on the costs of implementing IAQ improvements. However, the evidence strongly indicates that the cost of inaction—represented by the ongoing healthcare expenditures and productivity losses—is far greater.(9) Cost-benefit analyses of IAQ improvements, such as increased ventilation or enhanced filtration, consistently show that the economic benefits derived from improved health and productivity significantly outweigh the implementation and operational costs, often with remarkably short payback periods.(21) For example, the Lancet Commission on Pollution and Health noted that in the U.S., every dollar invested in air pollution control since 1970 has yielded an estimated $30 in benefits.(23) Therefore, addressing the IAQ crisis is not just a public health imperative but also an economically sound strategy.

Table 2: Estimated Economic Impacts of Poor IAQ in the U.S.
Note: Estimates vary based on methodology, scope, and year. Figures are presented as reported in sources; conversions or adjustments for inflation may affect direct comparability.

---

Learning from Precedent: The Success of Building Codes in Protecting Public Welfare

The call for a national indoor air quality code is not a proposal for an entirely novel form of regulation. Rather, it represents a logical and necessary extension of a well-established and highly successful system of building codes that already governs structural integrity, fire safety, electrical installations, and plumbing systems. Examining the history, purpose, and impact of these existing codes provides a powerful precedent and compelling rationale for codifying protections for the air we breathe indoors.

A Legacy of Safety: How Structural, Fire, Electrical, and Plumbing Codes Revolutionized Public Health

Modern building codes in the United States are the product of over a century of evolution, often driven by tragedy and the recognition that minimum standards are essential for public safety and health.(10) Early regulations frequently emerged as local responses to devastating events. Catastrophic urban fires in the 19th and early 20th centuries, such as the Great Chicago Fire (1871) and the Baltimore Fire (1904), starkly revealed the dangers of unregulated construction practices.(10) These events spurred the development of fire codes, initially promoted by insurance groups like the National Board of Fire Underwriters (NBFU), which published the first model building code in 1905 focusing on fire-resistant construction.(10) Tragedies like the Iroquois Theater fire (1903) and the Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire (1911) led directly to stricter requirements for exits, stairways, occupancy limits, and fire suppression systems, eventually codified in standards like the National Fire Protection Association's (NFPA) Life Safety Code (NFPA 101).(11) These reactive origins underscore a critical lesson: proactive standards based on known risks are preferable to waiting for disaster to compel action. The accumulated evidence of harm from poor IAQ justifies such proactive measures today.

Similarly, the development of electrical codes arose from the need for safety and consistency as electricity became widespread. The existence of multiple conflicting standards in the late 1800s created confusion and hazards.(48) This led to the development of the National Electrical Code (NEC) in 1897, sponsored by the NFPA, providing a uniform standard for safe electrical installations.(48) The National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), initiated by the National Bureau of Standards (now NIST) in 1913, addressed safety in utility systems.(50) These codes aimed to prevent fires, electrocution, and system failures by standardizing wiring methods, clearances, and work practices.(49)

Plumbing codes also evolved to address critical public health concerns. In the early 20th century, inconsistent local regulations, often based on guesswork, failed to adequately address sanitation and prevent water system failures or contamination.(51) Recognizing this, then-Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover spearheaded efforts within the National Bureau of Standards, leading to research and the publication of the first national plumbing code recommendations (the "Hoover Code") in 1928.(51) Organizations like the International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials (IAPMO), founded in 1926, developed comprehensive codes like the Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) to protect public health through standardized requirements for safe water supply and sanitation systems.(52)

The historical trajectory consistently shows a move from fragmented, often inadequate local rules towards standardized, science-based model codes developed through consensus processes involving industry experts, government agencies, and safety organizations.(10) The adoption of these model codes (like the International Codes or I-Codes developed by the ICC) by state and local jurisdictions has created a baseline of safety across the nation.(10) This history provides a clear roadmap: just as standardization was essential for fire, electrical, and plumbing safety, a national standard is needed to address the inconsistencies and inequities inherent in the current patchwork approach to IAQ.(5) Furthermore, these codes are not static; they undergo regular revision cycles to incorporate new technologies, materials, and scientific understanding (10), demonstrating a capacity for adaptation that would also be essential for a national IAQ code.

Establishing Baselines for Safety and Market Efficiency

Building codes serve a crucial economic and social function beyond preventing immediate disasters. They establish minimum standards for safety, health, and general welfare, addressing inherent market failures and improving overall efficiency.10

One key function is correcting information asymmetry. Homebuyers, tenants, and building occupants typically lack the expertise to fully assess the structural integrity, fire resistance, electrical safety, or plumbing adequacy of a building.(10) Without codes, there is a risk of a "lemons problem," where builders might cut corners on safety, and occupants only discover the defects when problems arise.(10) Building codes provide a baseline guarantee of quality and safety, reducing uncertainty and allowing individuals to occupy buildings with a reasonable expectation of protection.(10) Indoor air quality represents a particularly acute form of this information asymmetry. Occupants cannot easily see or measure the complex mix of potential pollutants like PM2.5, VOCs, or CO2 levels. An IAQ code would function like other codes by providing this essential, baseline assurance of breathable air quality.

Codes also enhance market efficiency by reducing transaction costs.(10) When buildings are known to meet established safety standards, the need for extensive, costly individual inspections by buyers, insurers, and lenders is reduced. This facilitates financing and insurance processes, making them easier and potentially cheaper.10 Similarly, an IAQ code could reduce the "health transaction costs" currently borne by individuals—the time, expense, and anxiety associated with diagnosing IAQ-related illnesses, seeking medical care, and attempting to identify and mitigate problems in their homes or workplaces. By ensuring a healthier baseline, an IAQ code reduces these individual burdens and contributes to broader economic efficiency.

Furthermore, building codes address negative externalities—costs imposed on third parties.10 A structurally unsound building that collapses can damage adjacent properties. A fire originating in one unit due to faulty wiring or lack of fire separation can spread, endangering neighbors and the community.10 Codes mitigate these risks by enforcing standards that protect not only the occupants but also the surrounding community.10 While existing codes focus on preventing these types of negative externalities, an IAQ code offers the potential for significant positive externalities. Buildings with good IAQ, achieved through effective ventilation and filtration mandated by a code, can reduce the community transmission of airborne infectious diseases.19 This benefits the entire community by lowering the overall burden of illness, reducing strain on healthcare systems, and enhancing public health resilience—a clear public good extending beyond the individual building occupant.

The Analogy: Why IAQ Deserves the Same Level of Codified Protection

The rationale underpinning structural, fire, electrical, and plumbing codes applies with equal, if not greater, force to indoor air quality. IAQ is a fundamental determinant of the health, safety, and well-being of building occupants, yet it remains the "missing pillar" in the national framework of building safety regulations.

The core purpose of building codes is to protect public health, safety, and general welfare.(12) The evidence presented in Section 2 clearly demonstrates that poor IAQ poses significant risks to all three. The health impacts range from irritation and allergies to severe chronic diseases and cognitive impairment, while the economic costs run into the hundreds of billions annually. Just as society deemed it unacceptable to leave structural stability or fire safety to chance or voluntary measures, it is similarly unacceptable to neglect the quality of the air that occupants breathe for the vast majority of their lives.

The principles of risk mitigation and market efficiency that justify existing codes are directly applicable to IAQ. Occupants face significant information asymmetry regarding the air quality in their buildings. An IAQ code would provide a necessary baseline assurance of safety, reducing individual health risks and the associated "health transaction costs." It would also generate positive externalities by contributing to reduced community disease transmission.

Moreover, the increasing focus on energy efficiency in buildings creates a compelling synergy and urgency for a dedicated IAQ code. Energy conservation measures, such as tightening building envelopes to reduce air leakage, are crucial for climate goals but can inadvertently degrade IAQ if not accompanied by adequate mechanical ventilation and filtration.(57) These energy codes, while vital, primarily focus on energy performance, sometimes putting energy conservation in direct conflict with IAQ by reducing necessary air exchange rates.(57) A national IAQ code is essential to ensure a balanced approach, guaranteeing that energy-efficient buildings are also healthy buildings. It ensures that the pursuit of sustainability does not compromise the fundamental need for breathable air.

The public reasonably expects that buildings meeting code are fundamentally safe. This implicit trust currently extends to the air inside, yet the lack of a comprehensive IAQ code means this expectation is often unmet. Establishing a national IAQ code would align regulatory protection with public expectation and fulfill the overarching goal of building codes: to provide minimum standards for safe and healthy environments. It is the logical next step in the evolution of building safety standards in the United States.

Table 3: Comparison of Existing Building Codes and Proposed IAQ Code

---

Envisioning a National Indoor Air Quality Code: Core Pillars and Key Components

Developing a national IAQ code requires establishing clear principles and defining specific, actionable components. Such a code should not be created in a vacuum but should build upon existing knowledge, consensus standards, and successful practices, both domestically and internationally. The goal is to create a robust yet adaptable framework that effectively protects public health while remaining technically feasible and economically viable.

Foundational Principles: Learning from EPA, ASHRAE, and International Best Practices

A national IAQ code should be grounded in several key principles:

1. Health-Based Targets: The primary goal must be the protection of human health. Standards and requirements should be based on the best available scientific evidence linking exposures to health outcomes, aiming to minimize adverse effects.(13) This involves referencing health guidelines from authoritative bodies like the World Health Organization (WHO) where applicable for specific pollutants (15) and moving beyond older standards based solely on odor control.(61)

2. Multi-Layered Strategy (Source Control, Ventilation, Filtration): Recognizing that no single strategy is sufficient, the code must integrate the EPA's recommended three-pronged approach.(14) This involves:

   1. Source Control: Minimizing the introduction of pollutants at their origin (e.g., low-emitting materials, proper appliance venting).

   2. Ventilation: Diluting and removing indoor pollutants with sufficient outdoor air.

   3. Filtration/Air Cleaning: Removing particles and contaminants from recirculated indoor air and incoming outdoor air. An effective code must address all three layers synergistically.

3. Leveraging Consensus Standards: The technical foundation of the code should leverage widely recognized, consensus-based standards, particularly those developed by ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers). ASHRAE Standards 62.1 (Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality) and 62.2 (Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings) provide detailed, peer-reviewed requirements for ventilation rates, system design, and procedures for achieving acceptable IAQ in various building types.(13) These standards are already referenced in many existing building codes (63) and provide a robust starting point.

4. Performance and Prescriptive Pathways: To allow for flexibility and innovation while ensuring baseline safety, the code should incorporate both prescriptive requirements (e.g., specifying minimum filter efficiency) and performance-based pathways (e.g., demonstrating achievement of target pollutant concentration levels).(13) This approach is common in modern building codes, including ASHRAE standards and California's Title 24.(25)

5. Adaptability and Continuous Improvement: IAQ science and technology are constantly evolving. The code must be a living document, incorporating mechanisms for regular review and updates based on new research findings, technological advancements, and lessons learned from implementation.(10) International experiences from regions like the EU, Canada, and various Asian nations can provide valuable insights and models for specific requirements and implementation strategies.(64)

6. Verification and Enforcement: The code's effectiveness hinges on ensuring that design intent translates into real-world performance. Requirements for commissioning, testing, balancing, ongoing monitoring, and regular maintenance are crucial to verify compliance and sustain IAQ benefits over time.(68)

Minimum Ventilation Standards for Healthy Air Exchange

Adequate ventilation is fundamental to maintaining acceptable IAQ by diluting and removing pollutants generated indoors, including CO2, bioeffluents, VOCs, and airborne pathogens. A national IAQ code must mandate minimum outdoor air ventilation rates.

These rates should be based on established standards like ASHRAE 62.1 for commercial/institutional buildings and 62.2 for residential buildings.(13) These standards typically specify rates based on factors like floor area, occupancy density, and space type/activity level (e.g., cfm per person or cfm per square foot).(61) For example, ASHRAE 62.2-2016 recommends residential homes receive 0.35 air changes per hour but not less than 15 cfm per person.60 ASHRAE 62.1 provides more complex calculations for diverse non-residential spaces.(13)

It is critical that these minimum rates are sufficient to protect health, not merely control odors or CO2 to minimally acceptable comfort levels, as was the focus of some older standards.(61) The code must also address the proper distribution of this outdoor air to ensure it reaches all occupied zones effectively.(61) Provisions may be needed to ensure ventilation systems can operate effectively during all occupied hours and potentially during pre- and post-occupancy flushing periods, especially during times of higher risk.(69) The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) supports research to better quantify IAQ conditions and the impact of ventilation changes, but opposes increases in ventilation rates unless justified by health-based field studies.(71) This highlights the need for the code's ventilation requirements to be clearly linked to health evidence.

Advanced Filtration Requirements: Targeting Particulate Matter and Pathogens

Filtration plays a critical role in removing harmful particulate matter (especially PM2.5) and airborne pathogens from both incoming outdoor air and recirculated indoor air. A national IAQ code should mandate minimum filtration efficiencies for HVAC systems.

Based on recommendations from the EPA, ASHRAE's Epidemic Task Force, and best practices emerging from the COVID-19 pandemic, a minimum efficiency of MERV 13 (Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value) or higher is appropriate for most commercial, institutional, and potentially residential settings.16 MERV 13 filters are significantly more effective than typical MERV 8 filters at capturing smaller airborne particles in the 1-3 μm range and demonstrate at least 50% efficiency for particles 0.3-1.0 μm, which includes respiratory aerosols that can carry viruses.16 California's Title 24 already mandates MERV 13 filtration in certain residential applications.(25)

The code must specify that filters be properly sized and installed within the HVAC system to prevent air bypass (air going around the filter rather than through it).16 It should also include requirements for regular filter inspection and replacement according to manufacturer recommendations or pressure drop indicators to ensure continued effectiveness.(16) Consideration should also be given to the HVAC system's capacity to handle the increased pressure drop associated with higher-efficiency filters.16 Where central system filtration is insufficient, the code might allow or recommend the use of appropriately sized portable air cleaners with HEPA filters.(16)

Controlling Pollutant Sources: Limits on VOCs, Formaldehyde, and Other Harmful Emissions

Source control is often the most effective and cost-efficient strategy for improving IAQ.(14) A national code should incorporate measures to limit the emission of harmful pollutants from materials used within buildings.

This could involve setting maximum allowable emission limits for VOCs, formaldehyde, and other known hazardous chemicals from building materials (e.g., flooring, insulation, paints, adhesives, sealants, engineered wood products) and furnishings.(2) The code could reference existing third-party certification programs (e.g., CRI Green Label Plus, FloorScore, GREENGUARD) or establish its own criteria based on health data.(18) International examples, such as France's mandatory labeling of construction products for VOC emissions (74) or Japan's guidelines for specific VOCs and TVOC levels (75), offer potential models.

Emphasis should be placed on selecting the least toxic options available that meet performance requirements, particularly in sensitive environments like schools and healthcare facilities.(18) The code should also address proper installation sequencing (e.g., allowing high-emitting materials to off-gas before installing porous "sink" materials like carpet) and require adequate ventilation during and after the installation of new materials or application of coatings.(18) Requirements for proper venting of combustion appliances (stoves, furnaces, water heaters) to the outdoors are also essential source control measures.(14)

Monitoring and Maintenance Protocols for Sustained Performance

To ensure that IAQ protections remain effective throughout a building's life, a national code must include requirements for ongoing monitoring and maintenance. Design specifications alone do not guarantee long-term performance.

The code should mandate regular inspection and maintenance schedules for HVAC systems, including filter changes, cleaning of coils and drain pans, duct inspection, and verification of damper and control operation.(68) This ensures that ventilation and filtration systems continue to operate as designed.

Furthermore, the code should incorporate requirements for IAQ monitoring, particularly in higher-occupancy or sensitive environments. This could involve periodic professional IAQ assessments or the installation of continuous monitoring systems for key indicators.(68) Carbon dioxide (CO2) sensors are commonly used as a proxy for ventilation adequacy, with target levels often recommended below 800-1000 ppm.(70) Real-time monitoring of PM2.5 may also be appropriate in certain settings. The code should specify sensor placement, calibration requirements, and potentially data logging or alert functionalities to enable proactive IAQ management.(39) Clear protocols for responding to elevated pollutant levels identified through monitoring would also be necessary.

Addressing Specific Environments: Schools, Healthcare Facilities, and Workplaces

While a national IAQ code should establish baseline requirements for all buildings, it is essential to include specific, potentially more stringent, provisions for environments where occupants may be more vulnerable or where occupancy density is high.

• Schools: Given children's vulnerability and the impact of IAQ on learning and health 3, schools require particular attention. The code should incorporate recommendations from EPA's IAQ Tools for Schools program (18) and ASHRAE's guidance for schools (79), potentially requiring lower pollutant thresholds, higher ventilation rates per occupant, enhanced filtration, rigorous material selection protocols, and frequent monitoring.

• Healthcare Facilities: These settings require strict IAQ control to protect vulnerable patients and prevent healthcare-associated infections. Specific standards (often referencing ASHRAE/ASHE Standard 170) address ventilation rates, filtration levels, pressure relationships between zones, and humidity control to minimize pathogen transmission and exposure to hazardous chemicals.(13) An IAQ code should ensure alignment with or incorporation of these specialized requirements.

• Workplaces: Office buildings and other workplaces benefit significantly from good IAQ in terms of worker health, comfort, and productivity.(22) The code should ensure adequate ventilation and filtration based on occupancy density and activities, potentially incorporating provisions for occupant control or feedback mechanisms (76) and addressing specific pollutant sources common in offices (e.g., printers, furnishings). OSHA's guidance and the principles of occupational health and safety should inform workplace-specific requirements.(27)

By tailoring requirements to the specific needs and risks of different building types, a national IAQ code can provide more effective and targeted protection.

Table 4: Key Recommended Components for a National IAQ Code

---

Navigating the Path to Implementation: Challenges and Stakeholder Engagement

While the case for a national IAQ code is compelling based on public health and economic benefits, its successful implementation requires navigating significant technical, legislative, economic, and political challenges. Engaging diverse stakeholders and learning from international experiences will be crucial for developing a code that is both effective and practical.

Addressing Technical and Legislative Hurdles

Several technical complexities must be addressed in developing a national IAQ standard. Defining appropriate metrics and monitoring methods for the vast array of potential indoor pollutants is challenging.(19) While standards exist for pollutants like PM2.5 and CO, others like Total Volatile Organic Compounds (TVOCs) lack universally agreed-upon definitions and measurement protocols.(19) Monitoring biological contaminants like viruses and bacteria in real-time remains largely impractical for routine building management.(19) Furthermore, controlling sources like human occupants, who release CO2 and pathogens, presents unique difficulties.(19) These technical hurdles necessitate a focus on measurable indicators (like CO2 as a ventilation proxy, PM2.5), robust standards for ventilation and filtration, and source control measures targeting manageable sources like building materials.

Legislatively, establishing a national code requires careful consideration of federal versus state authority.(5) While the federal government could set a national baseline, implementation and enforcement would likely rely heavily on existing state and local building code infrastructure.(12) Defining the scope of the code—which building types are covered (new vs. existing, residential vs. commercial), and under what conditions (new construction, major renovation)—is critical.(57) Enforcement itself presents challenges, as IAQ conditions can fluctuate, and ensuring compliance across millions of diverse buildings requires significant resources and trained personnel.(19) The inherent variability of indoor spaces ("every space is different" (19)) suggests the need for flexible compliance pathways alongside clear minimum standards. Regulating non-occupational indoor environments, particularly private residences, also raises complex issues of privacy, personal liberty, and property rights that must be carefully navigated.(39)

Strategies to overcome these hurdles include:

• Phased Implementation: Starting with public and commercial buildings, especially schools and healthcare facilities, where the public health justification is strong and enforcement may be more feasible.(19)

• Leveraging Existing Frameworks: Integrating IAQ requirements into existing model building codes (like the I-Codes) and utilizing established state/local adoption and enforcement mechanisms.(12)

• Building on Model Legislation: Adapting frameworks like the Model Clean Indoor Air Quality Act (MCIAA).(5)

• Focusing on Performance and Prescriptive Options: Providing flexibility through performance-based compliance pathways while maintaining clear prescriptive minimums.(13)

• Investing in Technology and Data: Supporting the development and standardization of reliable, low-cost IAQ sensors and data platforms to aid monitoring and compliance verification (39), while providing guidance on data interpretation to avoid misuse.

Economic Considerations: Costs, Benefits, and Incentives

The economic implications of a national IAQ code are a central concern for stakeholders. Opponents often highlight the potential for increased upfront costs associated with implementing stricter standards.(20) These costs can include higher expenses for advanced HVAC systems, higher-efficiency filters (e.g., MERV 13+), low-emitting building materials, IAQ monitoring equipment, and potentially more complex design and construction processes.(9) Concerns are particularly acute regarding the cost of retrofitting existing buildings and the potential impact on affordable housing development, where even modest cost increases can affect project viability.(9) The need for a larger, better-trained workforce of code officials and IAQ professionals also represents an implementation cost.(20)

However, a comprehensive economic assessment must weigh these costs against the substantial, often overlooked, costs of inaction and the significant benefits of improved IAQ. As detailed in Section 2.2.2, the current economic burden from poor IAQ—including healthcare expenditures and lost productivity—is estimated in the hundreds of billions of dollars annually.(7) Numerous cost-benefit analyses demonstrate that investments in IAQ improvements yield substantial returns. Studies show productivity gains in office workers far exceeding the increased energy and maintenance costs, with payback periods potentially under four months.(21) Research by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory estimates net annual economic benefits of $9 billion to $38 billion from various scenarios of increased ventilation in US offices, vastly exceeding energy cost increases.(22) The principle of focusing on lifecycle costs, rather than solely upfront costs, is crucial; the long-term savings from reduced illness, lower absenteeism, and enhanced cognitive function often dwarf the initial investments.

To address legitimate cost concerns and facilitate adoption, particularly for existing buildings and affordable housing, financial mechanisms are essential. Policy options include:

• Federal Grants and Funding: Utilizing existing or new federal funding streams (e.g., programs funded by the American Rescue Plan (82), infrastructure bills, or dedicated EPA grants for schools (78)) to support IAQ assessments and upgrades in public buildings, schools, and low-income communities.(9)

• Tax Incentives: Providing tax credits for building owners who conduct IAQ assessments or install compliant ventilation and filtration systems, similar to proposals like the Airborne Act.(72)

• Utility Programs: Encouraging or requiring energy utilities to incorporate IAQ measures into their energy efficiency incentive programs.

• Tiered Implementation: Phasing in requirements over time or setting different compliance deadlines for various building types or sizes to allow the market and workforce to adapt.

Furthermore, a national IAQ code can act as a market transformation mechanism. By creating consistent demand, it can drive innovation in IAQ technologies and materials, potentially leading to economies of scale and lower costs over time, similar to the trajectory observed with energy-efficient products following code advancements.

Engaging Key Stakeholders: Building Industry, Public Health Advocates, Labor, and Government

The successful development and implementation of a national IAQ code depend critically on engaging a wide range of stakeholders with diverse interests and perspectives. Building consensus and addressing concerns proactively are essential. Key stakeholder groups include:

• Building Industry: This includes architects (AIA) (53), home builders (NAHB) (71), commercial building owners and managers (BOMA) (72), contractors, engineers (ASHRAE), and manufacturers of building materials and HVAC equipment. Concerns regarding code adoption often revolve around cost, technical feasibility, liability, and the desire for flexibility and regional variation.(20) Engagement requires acknowledging these concerns, involving industry representatives in the code development process (as AIA advocates for (53)), providing clear technical guidance, and demonstrating the business case for healthier buildings (e.g., tenant attraction/retention, productivity gains (38)). The COVID-19 pandemic increased industry awareness of IAQ (84), creating an opportunity for dialogue, although cost and operational impacts remain key discussion points.

• Public Health and Environmental Health Professionals: Organizations like the American Medical Association (AMA) (33), the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) (86), and academic research centers (e.g., Harvard Healthy Buildings Program (38)) are crucial advocates, providing scientific evidence on health impacts and technical expertise. Their role includes educating policymakers and the public, translating research into policy recommendations, and advocating for strong, health-protective standards.

• Labor Unions: Representing workers who build, maintain, and occupy buildings, unions are increasingly focused on IAQ as an occupational health and safety issue.(73) They advocate for standards that protect workers from airborne hazards, including pathogens and chemical exposures. Engaging unions can build a powerful coalition supporting IAQ codes, emphasizing worker safety and the need for a qualified, well-trained workforce to implement IAQ measures.(73)

• Environmental Organizations: Groups focused on environmental protection and climate change (e.g., BlueGreen Alliance (73), Environmental Law Institute (4)) recognize the links between energy use, climate resilience, and IAQ. They can advocate for integrated solutions that improve IAQ while supporting decarbonization and resilience goals.

• Consumer Advocacy Groups and Community Organizations: These groups represent the interests of building occupants, particularly vulnerable populations.(3) They can advocate for transparency, strong protections, and equitable implementation, ensuring that the benefits of improved IAQ reach all communities.

• Government Agencies: Collaboration across federal agencies (coordinated through bodies like the Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality - CIAQ (88)), as well as engagement with state and local government associations (e.g., National Governors Association 89, US Conference of Mayors (91), National League of Cities (78)), is vital for developing implementable policies and leveraging existing regulatory structures.

Effective engagement strategies include transparent code development processes, public comment periods, targeted outreach and education, development of clear compliance guidance, and fostering public-private partnerships to promote innovation and best practices.(26) Framing IAQ as a shared responsibility benefiting worker safety, public health, economic productivity, and community resilience can help bridge different stakeholder priorities.

Learning from International Models: Successes and Lessons from Other Nations

While the U.S. lacks a comprehensive national IAQ code, other developed nations and regions have implemented various regulatory approaches, offering valuable lessons.

• European Union: The EU is increasingly integrating Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ), which includes IAQ, into its building policies, notably through the recast Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD).(66) This directive mandates Member States to consider optimal IEQ when setting energy performance standards and requires IAQ monitoring (temperature, humidity, ventilation rate, contaminants, lighting) in new zero-emission non-residential buildings.(66) This approach highlights the synergy between energy efficiency and IAQ but relies on Member State implementation. Air quality monitoring across Europe shows progress but indicates that stricter WHO guidelines are often not met, particularly for PM2.5.(64)

• Canada: Canada relies on the general duty clause in occupational health and safety legislation and references ASHRAE standards in building codes.(63) Health Canada provides specific guidance, such as recommending MERV 13 filtration in office buildings.(94) This model emphasizes guidance and existing standards but lacks strong, uniform national mandates.

• South Korea: South Korea has a national Indoor Air Quality Control Act, but studies suggest its pollutant limits (e.g., for PM2.5) and enforcement are less strict compared to WHO guidelines and some other nations.(95) This illustrates that simply having a law is insufficient; its stringency and enforcement are critical.

• Japan: Japan has established guidelines for 13 VOCs and a provisional target for TVOCs in buildings, which studies suggest are effective in reducing building-related symptoms.(75) However, challenges remain, particularly regarding ventilation practices and CO2 levels in residential buildings, highlighting the gap between regulation and occupant behavior.(67)

• Singapore: Singapore utilizes specific codes like SS 553 (Code of Practice for Air-Conditioning and Mechanical Ventilation in Buildings) which sets requirements (e.g., 10 L/s per person ventilation for offices) and encourages compliance through programs like the BCA Green Mark certification.(65)

Lessons from these international models include: the importance of setting specific, health-based pollutant limits; the trend towards integrating IAQ with energy efficiency policies; the persistent challenge of ensuring effective implementation, compliance, and enforcement even where regulations exist; and the value of combining mandatory requirements with incentive programs and public education. While no single model is directly transferable, these experiences underscore the feasibility of national-level IAQ action and provide diverse strategies for consideration in the U.S. context.

Table 5: Summary of Cost-Benefit Analyses for IAQ Improvements

Note: These analyses primarily focus on office/commercial settings where productivity gains are more easily monetized. Benefits in residential, school, and healthcare settings would include health cost savings, improved learning, reduced disease transmission, and enhanced quality of life, which are equally important but sometimes harder to quantify in purely economic terms.

---

Recommendations: Charting a Course for Healthier Indoor Environments in the U.S.

The evidence clearly indicates that poor indoor air quality poses a significant threat to public health and imposes a substantial economic burden on the United States. Learning from the success of existing building codes and drawing on established scientific principles and standards, it is imperative that the nation acts decisively to address this invisible threat. Establishing a comprehensive national IAQ code is the most effective path forward. The following recommendations outline a course for legislative action and implementation:

Legislative Action: Establishing a Federal Mandate for IAQ

Congress should enact legislation establishing a national Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) code. This code would create federally mandated minimum standards for IAQ in buildings across the United States, addressing the current regulatory gap 5 and inconsistent patchwork of state regulations.(5)

• Scope: The initial mandate should apply to all new construction and substantial renovations of federal buildings, public buildings (including K-12 schools), healthcare facilities, and large commercial buildings. A clear pathway and timeline should be established for extending coverage to other commercial buildings and multi-family residential properties, with further study dedicated to effectively addressing single-family homes while respecting privacy concerns.(39)

• Authority: The legislation should designate a lead federal agency (e.g., EPA) or establish an interagency council (building on the model of the CIAQ (88)) with the authority and resources to develop, promulgate, maintain, and oversee the national IAQ code. This body must work in close collaboration with ASHRAE, CDC, NIOSH, DOE, and other relevant federal agencies and standards development organizations.(53)

• Foundation: The code should be based on the foundational principles outlined in Section 4.1, incorporating the multi-layered approach of source control, ventilation, and filtration (14), leveraging ASHRAE standards 62.1 and 62.2 (13), and aiming for health-based targets informed by WHO guidelines.(15)

Phased Implementation and Support Mechanisms

Recognizing the economic and logistical challenges, the national IAQ code should be implemented strategically and with robust support mechanisms.

• Phased Rollout: Implement the code requirements in phases, prioritizing building types with vulnerable occupants (schools, healthcare) or high occupancy density (large workplaces) first. Allow reasonable timelines for states and localities to adopt and begin enforcing the code, potentially tied to existing building code update cycles.(20)

• Financial Assistance: Establish dedicated federal funding programs, potentially through grants, low-interest loans, and tax incentives, to assist building owners with the costs of IAQ assessments, system upgrades, and retrofits necessary for compliance.(9) Priority should be given to public institutions (especially schools in low-income areas (78)), small businesses, and affordable housing developments to ensure equitable implementation and mitigate concerns about cost burdens.(9) Existing funds, such as those from the American Rescue Plan or infrastructure legislation, should be clearly designated as eligible for IAQ improvements.(82)

• Technical Assistance: Create robust technical assistance programs through agencies like EPA and DOE to support state and local code officials, building designers, contractors, and facility managers in understanding and implementing the new IAQ code requirements. This includes developing clear guidance documents, compliance tools, and best practice manuals.

Investing in Research, Education, and Workforce Development

Sustained progress requires ongoing investment in knowledge generation and human capital.

• Research Funding: Significantly increase federal funding for IAQ research through agencies like EPA, NIOSH, NIH, and NSF. Research priorities should include: health effects of emerging indoor pollutants and pollutant mixtures, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of various IAQ intervention strategies (including ventilation, filtration, and source control), development and validation of low-cost IAQ sensors, and long-term impacts of improved IAQ on health outcomes and economic productivity.(39)

• Public Education: Launch national public awareness campaigns, led by agencies like EPA and CDC, to educate the public, building occupants, and employers about the importance of IAQ, common indoor pollutants and sources, and practical steps individuals and organizations can take to improve indoor air.(26)

• Workforce Development: Invest in training and certification programs for building professionals, including architects, engineers, HVAC technicians, building inspectors, and facility managers, to ensure a qualified workforce capable of designing, installing, commissioning, inspecting, and maintaining buildings according to the new IAQ code.(20) Partner with technical colleges, unions, and professional organizations to develop curricula and apprenticeship programs.

Fostering Public-Private Partnerships for Innovation and Compliance

Addressing the IAQ challenge effectively requires collaboration across sectors.

• Stakeholder Collaboration: Establish formal mechanisms for ongoing dialogue and collaboration between government agencies, standards bodies (ASHRAE, ICC), industry associations (AIA, BOMA, NAHB), labor unions, public health organizations, researchers, and community advocates throughout the code development, implementation, and revision processes.(5)

• Promoting Innovation: Encourage innovation in IAQ technologies (e.g., energy-efficient ventilation with heat recovery, advanced filtration media, smart sensors and controls, low-emitting materials) through research grants, challenge prizes, and potentially performance-based code pathways that reward innovative solutions.

• Voluntary Programs and Recognition: Support and expand voluntary programs like EPA's Indoor airPLUS and the Clean Air in Buildings Challenge (26) to recognize leadership and encourage adoption of best practices beyond minimum code requirements. Consider developing a public-facing IAQ rating or disclosure system for buildings to increase transparency and empower occupants.(69)

---

Conclusion

Implementing a national Indoor Air Quality code represents a monumental opportunity to improve the health, well-being, and productivity of the American people. It aligns with the historical progression of building safety standards and addresses a critical, overlooked environmental exposure. While challenges exist, the overwhelming evidence of harm from inaction, coupled with the demonstrated success of similar codes and the substantial documented benefits of improved IAQ, makes a compelling case for federal leadership. By establishing clear standards, providing necessary support, fostering collaboration, and investing in knowledge and workforce, the United States can ensure that the buildings where we spend our lives contribute to, rather than detract from, our health. This is not simply a matter of regulation; it is a fundamental investment in a healthier, more resilient, and more prosperous future.

---

Works Cited

1. Executive Summary - Indoor Allergens - NCBI Bookshelf, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236018/

2. Introduction to Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/introduction-indoor-air-quality

3. Indoor Air Quality Matters - National School Boards Association, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nsba.org/resources/feb-2025-indoor-air-quality-matters

4. Why is Indoor Air Quality Policy Important? | Environmental Law ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.eli.org/buildings/about-the-program

5. States Are Innovating to Improve Indoor Air Quality | ASTHO, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.astho.org/communications/blog/2025/states-innovating-to-improve-indoor-air-quality/

6. The Next Public Health Frontier with Indoor Air Quality - TU Law Digital Commons, accessed May 8, 2025, https://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3343&context=tlr

7. Economic impact of poor indoor air quality - Cleanfax, accessed May 8, 2025, https://cleanfax.com/economic-impact-of-poor-indoor-air-quality/

8. www.workdesign.com, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.workdesign.com/2020/01/higher-productivity-out-of-thin-air/#:~:text=The%20National%20Oceanic%20and%20Atmospheric,associated%20with%20sick%20building%20syndrome.

9. Policymakers at All Levels Can Work Toward Better Indoor Air ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://crcmich.org/policymakers-at-all-levels-can-work-toward-better-indoor-air-quality

10. The Evolution of U.S. Building Codes: History, Economics, and ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://garynsmith.net/the-evolution-of-u-s-building-codes-history-economics-and-modern-impacts/

11. apps.usfa.fema.gov, accessed May 8, 2025, https://apps.usfa.fema.gov/pdf/efop/efo47056.pdf

12. sgp.fas.org, accessed May 8, 2025, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R47665.pdf

13. Standards 62.1 & 62.2 - ASHRAE, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ashrae.org/technical-resources/bookstore/standards-62-1-62-2

14. Improving Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/improving-indoor-air-quality

15. WHO air quality guidelines - C40 Knowledge Hub, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.c40knowledgehub.org/s/article/WHO-Air-Quality-Guidelines?language=en_US

16. Guide to Air Cleaners in the Home | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/guide-air-cleaners-home

17. The Role of Air Filters in Air Handling Units for Maintaining ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://cleanair.camfil.us/2024/01/13/the-role-of-air-filters-in-air-handling-units-for-maintaining-commercial-and-public-building-indoor-air-quality/

18. Controlling Pollutants and Sources: Indoor Air Quality Design Tools ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/iaq-schools/controlling-pollutants-and-sources-indoor-air-quality-design-tools-schools

19. Indoor Air Quality Standards: Challenges and Solutions - ActivePure ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://activepure.com/blog/indoor-air-quality-standards-challenges-solutions/

20. neep.org, accessed May 8, 2025, https://neep.org/sites/default/files/media-files/final_systemic_barriers.pdf

21. (PDF) Cost-benefit analysis of improved air quality in an office building, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241837912_Cost-benefit_analysis_of_improved_air_quality_in_an_office_building

22. Increased Ventilation Rates | Indoor Air - Lawrence Berkeley ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://iaqscience.lbl.gov/increased-ventilation-rates

23. Lancet Commission on Pollution & Health - Pure Earth, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.pureearth.org/lancet-commission-on-pollution-health/

24. Criteria Air Pollutants | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/criteria-air-pollutants

25. Energy Code Ace - - Mandatory Requirements for Ventilation and ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://energycodeace.com/content/section-1602-mandatory-requirements-for-ventilation-and-ind

26. Clean Air in Buildings | The White House - Joe Biden for President, accessed May 8, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/cleanindoorair/

27. Indoor Air Quality - Overview | Occupational Safety and Health Administration, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.osha.gov/indoor-air-quality

28. Air Pollutants | Air Quality | CDC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/air-quality/pollutants/index.html

29. Air Pollutants | Department of Natural Resources - Iowa DNR, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.iowadnr.gov/environmental-protection/air-quality/air-pollutants

30. Nearly 3.2 million people die prematurely each year from diseases caused by household air pollution - World Health Organization (WHO), accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.who.int/teams/environment-climate-change-and-health/air-quality-energy-and-health/sectoral-interventions/household-air-pollution/health-risks

31. Household air pollution - World Health Organization (WHO), accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/household-air-pollution-and-health

32. Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq

33. Informing Physicians, Health Care Providers, and the Public that Cooking with a Gas Stove Increases Household Air Pollution and the Risk of Childhood Asthma D-135.964 - AMA Policy Finder - American Medical Association, accessed May 8, 2025, https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/gas%20stove?uri=%2FAMADoc%2Fdirectives.xml-D-135.964.xml

34. Air Pollution | Climate and Health | CDC, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.cdc.gov/climate-health/php/effects/air-pollution.html

35. Effect of indoor air quality on the association of long-term exposure ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36791838/

36. Association between Indoor Air Pollution and Cognitive Impairment ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6126300/

37. Worker Productivity and Safety | Industrial Maid, accessed May 8, 2025, https://industrial-maid.com/blogs/blog/worker-productivity-and-safety

38. Indoor Air Quality - Healthy Buildings, accessed May 8, 2025, https://healthybuildings.hsph.harvard.edu/research/indoor-air-quality/

39. National Academies of Sciences Report Highlights Indoor Air Quality ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.insideenergyandenvironment.com/2022/05/national-academies-of-sciences-report-highlights-indoor-air-quality-issues-and-regulatory-considerations/

40. Control Indoor Allergens to Improve Indoor Air Quality, accessed May 8, 2025, https://aafa.org/allergies/prevent-allergies/control-indoor-allergens/

41. Effect of indoor air quality on potential risk of obstructive sleep apnea: results from Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey - PubMed, accessed May 8, 2025, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40197163/

42. The High Hidden Costs of Indoor Air Pollution - YourIAQ, accessed May 8, 2025, https://youriaq.com/hidden-costs-of-indoor-air-pollution/

43. The Hidden Cost of Air Pollution: Economic Impacts Beyond Health ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://tisch-env.com/hidden-cost-of-air-pollution/

44. The price of air pollution on American's healthcare | World Economic ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/06/air-pollution-cost-america-healthcare-study/

45. Indoor Air Quality: The Key To Higher Productivity Out Of Thin Air, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.workdesign.com/2020/01/higher-productivity-out-of-thin-air/

46. Cost-benefit analysis of improved air quality in an office building - Comag IR, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.comag-ir.com/download/Cost%20benefit%20from%20improved%20air%20quality.pdf

47. Changing ventilation rates in U.S. offices: Implications for health, work performance, energy, and associated economics - ResearchGate, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/257171768_Changing_ventilation_rates_in_US_offices_Implications_for_health_work_performance_energy_and_associated_economics

48. What Is the History of NFPA?, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nfpa.org/news-blogs-and-articles/blogs/2024/11/06/history-of-nfpa

49. The History of Electrical Safety - CESnews, accessed May 8, 2025, https://blog.cityelectricsupply.com/history-electrical-safety/

50. standards.ieee.org, accessed May 8, 2025, https://standards.ieee.org/wp-content/uploads/import/documents/other/nesc_history.pdf

51. History of Plumbing Research at NIST | NIST, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nist.gov/el/energy-and-environment-division-73200/premise-plumbing-research-nist/history-plumbing-research

52. Uniform Plumbing Code (UPC) | IAPMO, accessed May 8, 2025, https://iapmo.org/codes-standards-development/code-development/uniform-plumbing-code

53. AIA Codes and Standards | The American Institute of Architects, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.aia.org/advocacy/codes-standards

54. Building code - Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_code

55. www.bloomfieldtwp.org, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.bloomfieldtwp.org/media/eobjudzy/brochure-buildingcodes.pdf

56. Household air pollution Commission - YouTube, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp4MiprLRrQ

57. www.epa.gov, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-08/documents/building_codes_and_iaq.pdf

58. Existing Building Energy Efficiency Renovation, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.energy.gov.au/sites/default/files/existing_building_energy_efficiency_renovation_-_international_review_of_regulatory_policies_-_september_2017_-_ipeec.pdf

59. Breathe Easy: A Guide to Improving Indoor Air Quality for a Safer, Healthier Working Space, accessed May 8, 2025, https://ohsonline.com/articles/2023/03/27/a-guide-to-improving-indoor-air-quality.aspx

60. How much ventilation do I need in my home to improve indoor air ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/how-much-ventilation-do-i-need-my-home-improve-indoor-air-quality

61. www.epa.gov, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2014-08/documents/ventilation_factsheet.pdf

62. Compliant Ventilation System Design (OSHA, ANSI, ASHRAE, NFPA, EPA) - Eldridge USA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://eldridgeusa.com/blog/compliant-ventilation-system-design-osha-ansi-ashrae-nfpa-epa/

63. Indoor Air Quality - General - CCOHS, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/chemicals/iaq/iaq_intro.html

64. Air quality steadily improving but EU standards still not fully met ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/newsroom/news/air-pollution-standards-still-not-fully-met-across-europe

65. Singapore IAQ Regulations: A Guide for Facility Managers - Initial, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.initial.com/sg/blog/air-care/singapore-iaq-regulations-guide-for-facility-managers

66. Acceptable indoor environmental quality and energy efficiency ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://build-up.ec.europa.eu/en/resources-and-tools/articles/acceptable-indoor-environmental-quality-and-energy-efficiency

67. Investigation of Indoor Air Quality in Residential Buildings by ... - MDPI, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/19/7331

68. How to Monitor Indoor Air Quality - TSI, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.tsi.com/occupational-health-safety/learn/how-to-monitor-indoor-air-quality

69. www.epa.gov, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2022-03/508-cleanairbuildings_factsheet_v5_508.pdf

70. Reliable solutions Complying with ASHRAE guidelines for ... - Belimo, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.belimo.com/mam/americas/technical_documents/Support%20material/belimo_PF-53-iaq_brochure_fr-ca.pdf

71. Ventilation Standards | NAHB, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nahb.org/advocacy/nahb-policies/construction-and-codes/ventilation-standards

72. Beyer Reintroduces Airborne Act, accessed May 8, 2025, https://beyer.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=6269

73. Key Questions - BlueGreen Alliance |, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.bluegreenalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/EPA-RFI-Buildings-IAQ-120522.pdf

74. Integrated Management of Residential Indoor Air Quality: A Call for ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750874/

75. Is indoor environment a risk factor of building-related symptoms ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9876365/

76. An Office Building Occupant's Guide to Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/office-building-occupants-guide-indoor-air-quality

77. Indoor Air Quality for Commercial Spaces - Seeley International, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.seeleyinternational.com/us/blog/indoor-air-quality-for-commercial-spaces/

78. Grant Funding to Address Indoor Air Pollution at Schools | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/iaq-schools/grant-funding-address-indoor-air-pollution-schools

79. Resources and Materials | Clean Indoor Air | The White House - Joe Biden for President, accessed May 8, 2025, https://bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/cleanindoorair/resources-and-materials/

80. Indoor Air Quality in Commercial and Institutional Buildings - OSHA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/publications/3430indoor-air-quality-sm.pdf

81. More Resilient Buildings Will Save Lives and Money, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.governing.com/urban/more-resilient-buildings-will-save-lives-and-money

82. Clean Air in Buildings Challenge - SMACNA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.smacna.org/business-resources/industry-resources/clean-air-in-buildings-challenge

83. Air Quality | NAHB, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nahb.org/advocacy/industry-issues/environment/air-quality

84. covid prevention and implications for indoor air quality and energy usage - BOMA International, accessed May 8, 2025, https://boma.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/COVID-IAQ-FAQ-BOMA.pdf

85. AMA Position on Air Pollution H-135.998 - AMA Policy Finder, accessed May 8, 2025, https://policysearch.ama-assn.org/policyfinder/detail/pollution%20health?uri=%2FAMADoc%2FHOD.xml-0-369.xml

86. AIHA's Public Affairs, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.aiha.org/public-resources/healthierworkplaces/healthier-community-resources/public-affairs

87. Trade Unions Push For Indoor Air Quality Pledge, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.thebesa.com/besa-latest-news/trade-unions-push-for-indoor-air-quality-pledge

88. Federal Interagency Committee on Indoor Air Quality | US EPA, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/federal-interagency-committee-indoor-air-quality

89. Workforce Development & Economic Policy - National Governors Association, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nga.org/bestpractices/workforce-development-economic-policy/

90. Careers - National Governors Association, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nga.org/about/careers/

91. America's Beverage Companies & U.S. Conference of Mayors Award $745K to Nine Cities for Community Health & Sustainability Programs, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.usmayors.org/2025/01/18/americas-beverage-companies-u-s-conference-of-mayors-award-745k-to-nine-cities-for-community-health-sustainability-programs/

92. United States Conference of Mayors - Wikipedia, accessed May 8, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Conference_of_Mayors

93. Housing Preservation Practices That Benefit People and the Environment, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.nlc.org/article/2025/01/23/housing-preservation-practices-that-benefit-people-and-the-environment/

94. Draft guidance on improving indoor air quality in office buildings ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consultation-draft-guidance-improving-indoor-air-quality-office-buildings/ventilation.html

95. Comparative Analysis of Indoor Air Quality Standards in Major ..., accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.e-jehs.org/journal/view.html?uid=2249&vmd=Full

96. www.aceee.org, accessed May 8, 2025, https://www.aceee.org/sites/default/files/proceedings/ssb24/assets/attachments/20240722163116359_5b9fd4a6-53b7-4e2f-9795-00bac5a7f1ff.pdf