Understanding "Ping Pong Water" and Navigating Attic Moisture Dynamics in Modern Roof Assemblies

The design of residential attics has undergone a significant transformation. Conventionally, attics were vented spaces with thermal insulation placed on the attic floor, separating the unconditioned attic from the conditioned living space below. However, contemporary building practices increasingly favor unvented, or "conditioned," attics where insulation is applied directly to the underside of the roof deck.[1] This shift is driven by several factors, including the desire to bring HVAC equipment and ductwork within the building's thermal and air barrier envelope to improve system efficiency and longevity, enhance overall building airtightness for energy savings, and create potentially usable conditioned or semi-conditioned space within the attic volume.[3]

Building Enclosure, Building Science, Dehumidification, HVAC, High Performance Homes, Healthy Home, Code, Architectural DesignPositive EnergyMay 23, 2025"Ping Pong Water" phenomenon, attic moisture dynamics, modern roof assemblies, unvented attics, conditioned attics, moisture control challenges, roof sheathing moisture, attic ventilation, airtightness, energy efficiency, solar radiation, thermal buoyancy, hygric buoyancy, OSB hygroscopicity, chemical potential of wood, sorption isotherms, hysteresis, OSB and mold susceptibility, roof assembly durability risks, sheathing degradation, rot, corrosion of metal components, "bound water, " climate zone dependence, spray polyurethane foam (SPF), open-cell SPF (ocSPF), closed-cell SPF (ccSPF), vapor permeability, air barrier qualities, water barrier, code requirements, active attic conditioning, supply air strategies, return air strategies, dedicated dehumidification, exterior insulation, vapor diffusion ridge vents, fibrous insulation assemblies, cellulose, fiberglass, mineral wool, air tightness, vapor control layer, hybrid insulation systems, architect design considerations, building science principles, interior humidity management, material compatibility, constructability, quality control, building codes, hygrothermal modeling, risk management, lifecycle costs.

Breathing Easy: The Case for a National Indoor Air Quality Code in the United States

The United States faces a significant, yet largely unregulated, public health challenge: the quality of the air inside its buildings. Americans spend approximately 90% of their time indoors , breathing air that can be two to five times, and occasionally more than 100 times, more polluted than outdoor air. Despite this reality, the nation lacks a comprehensive federal code specifically governing indoor air quality (IAQ), relying instead on a fragmented system of state regulations, voluntary guidelines, and limited occupational standards. This regulatory gap results in inconsistent protection and contributes to a silent epidemic of health problems—ranging from asthma and allergies to cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, and cancer—and imposes a substantial economic burden through healthcare costs and lost productivity, estimated in the tens to hundreds of billions of dollars annually.

CodePositive EnergyMay 1, 2025Indoor Air Quality (IAQ), national IAQ code, public health, building codes, regulations, ventilation, filtration, source control, pollutants, health effects, respiratory illnesses, allergies, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, economic burden, healthcare costs, lost productivity, EPA recommendations, ASHRAE standards, WHO guidelines, implementation challenges, legislative action, phased implementation, research, workforce development, public-private partnerships, Clean Air Act, National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), Model Clean Indoor Air Quality Act (MCIAA), California Title 24, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), General Duty Clause, Particulate Matter (PM), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), carbon monoxide (CO), radon, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O3), formaldehyde, mold, biological contaminants, asthma, COPD, sick building syndrome, structural codes, fire codes, electrical codes, plumbing codes, information asymmetry, market efficiency, negative externalities, energy efficiency, MERV 13 filters, monitoring protocols, maintenance, schools, healthcare facilities, workplaces, cost-benefit analysis, financial assistance, tax incentives, utility programs, stakeholder engagement, building industry, public health advocates, labor unions, environmental organizations, consumer advocacy groups, government agencies, international models, European Union, Canada, South Korea, Japan, Singapore, air changes per hour, carbon dioxide (CO2) sensors, commissioning, verification, education, public awareness campaigns.

The Damp Deception: How a Well-Intentioned Code Change is Fostering Mold in New Homes

The promise of a new home often includes visions of a healthier, more energy-efficient living space. However, a subtle yet significant regulatory shift in U.S. building codes, particularly affecting hot-humid climate zones, may be inadvertently undermining this very promise. Before 2021, residential ventilation requirements were often loosely enforced; homes were typically required to have a ventilator, but the actual volume of air exchanged was not mandated to be measured. This frequently led to systems being ineffectively installed or even "sabotaged" by HVAC contractors, rendering them inoperable or improperly configured from the outset. Consequently, many homes, even in that period, did not achieve consistent fresh air exchange. Compounding this, most residential HVAC systems lacked any form of supplemental or dedicated dehumidification, a feature that building science experts have increasingly recognized as crucial, especially for high-performance homes in moisture-laden environments.

Blog